Tuesday, May 14, 2013
NYT: Heavy Load of Student Loan Debt Is Weighing on the Economy, Too
The anemic economy has left millions of younger working Americans struggling to get ahead. The added millstone of student loan
debt, which recently exceeded $1 trillion in total, is making it even
harder for many of them, delaying purchases of things like homes, cars
and other big-ticket items and acting as a drag on growth, economists
said.
Consider Shane Gill, a 33-year-old high-school teacher in New York City.
He does not have a car. He does not own a home. He is not married. And
he is no anomaly: like hundreds of thousands of others in his
generation, he has put off such major purchases or decisions in part
because of his debts.
Mr. Gill owes about $45,000 in federal student loans, plus another
$40,000 to his parents. That investment in his future has led to a
secure job with decent pay and good benefits. But it has left him with
tremendous financial constraints, as he faces chipping away at the debt
for years on end.
“There’s this anxiety: what if I decided I wanted to get married or have
children?” Mr. Gill said. “I don’t know how I would. And that adds to
the sense of precariousness. There’s a persistent, buzzing kind of
toothache around it.”
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in a new study, found that
30-year-olds with student loans were now less likely to have debts like
home mortgages than 30-year-olds without student loans — even though
most of those with student loans are better educated and can expect to
earn more money over their lifetimes. The same pattern holds true for
25-year-olds and car loans.
“It is a new thing, a big social experiment that we’ve accidentally
decided to engage in,” said Kevin Carey, the director of the Education
Policy Program at the New America Foundation, a research group based in
Washington. “Let’s send a whole class of people out into their
professional lives with a negative net worth. Not starting at zero, but
starting at a minus that is often measured in the tens of thousands of
dollars. Those minus signs have psychological impact, I suspect. They
might have a dollars-and-cents impact in what you can afford, too.”
The weak economy and tight credit standards remain the main culprits
preventing young people just establishing themselves from making major
purchases. But millions now face putting a substantial share of their
take-home pay toward past debts rather than present needs. Student loan
debt leaves them with less money for things like clothes and restaurant
meals. And it is even more likely to suppress purchases of more
expensive items that need to be bought with credit. A poor job market is
compounding the problem: the educational debt burden of many so-called
millennials has sharply increased even as they are being forced to get
by on significantly less income than the previous generation — a decline
of about 15 percent in real terms since 2000, with much of that drop coming from the recession.
According to calculations by
the Pew Research Center, the measure of debt to income for households
under the age of 35 has ballooned to about 1.5-to-1 in 2010 from about
1-to-1 in 2001. The composition of that debt has shifted, too: more is
tied to student debts, and less to homes. “Having a lot of student loan
debt makes it harder to qualify for a mortgage and harder to save for a
down payment,” said Jed Kolko, the chief economist at Trulia.
With the interest rate on some federal student loans set to double on
July 1, House Republicans and Senate Democrats have both put forward
proposals to try to hold them down. Representative John Kline,
Republican of Minnesota, has proposed
tying the rate on several federal student loans to the government’s
borrowing costs. Democratic senators, including Dick Durbin of Illinois,
have made a similar proposal. Some have suggested going further: Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, has proposed letting students borrow at the same “discount rate” that the Federal Reserve charges to banks, currently 0.75 percent.
Student loan debt is not only constraining young adults, but also, at
least in the near term, holding back the recovery itself, some
economists say. The shadows might remain even as the economy picks up,
by making young workers more cautious when it comes to decisions about
their careers and their finances. Millennials might end up buying less
expensive homes or more often choosing to rent than previous
generations.
“The debt is shifting how much young people can spend, and it can also
be a powerful psychological thing as well,” said Selma Hepp, an
economist at the California Association of Realtors.
On the other side of the equation, many college graduates now in their
20s and early 30s should eventually be able to make up for lost ground.
Students who take on debt to pay for higher education commit themselves
to paying off huge sums, but they usually lift their lifetime earnings
by substantial amounts. And they are in a better position to insulate
themselves against economic bad times, given the profound rewards the
job market provides to the college-educated.
Indeed, the economy is far more punishing to workers without a college
degree. The college-educated earn, on average, 80 percent more than
those who only completed high school, a premium that has widened over the last 30 years. Unemployment rates for the less educated are higher, too.
For most young workers, gaining a college degree remains well worth it
in the long run, even if it delays some purchases in the near term. “For
an individual going to college and ending up with a lot of debt —
you’re still better off,” said Chris G. Christopher of the forecasting
firm IHS Global Insight. There might, however, be a slice of young
workers who paid huge sums for degrees that prove less valuable on the
job market, saddled by a debt burden that could end up holding them back
for decades.
Mr. Gill said his education remained a vital investment, even if the
debt overhang has for now put white picket fences or a condo with a
gleaming view out of reach. “Sometimes I think: ‘What if I were to buy
an apartment?’ ” he said. “It is like asking: ‘What am I going to do
when I first land on the moon? What’s the first thought that I will have
when I see Earth from outer space?’”
Copyright 2013 The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment