By Ashley Cullins
Wesley Snipes must pay millions to the IRS after failing to convince a
tax court that he doesn't have the assets to pay more than six
figures.
After the IRS tried to collect $23.5 million in back taxes, the actor
asked for an offer-in-compromise which would let him settle his debt
for less than the amount owed and for the notice of federal tax lien
that was filed against his home to be withdrawn. He put up just shy of
$850,000 in cash as an OIC, but the IRS rejected the offer and sustained
its lien. So Snipes filed a petition asking the tax court to overturn
the decision.
U.S. Tax Court Judge Kathleen Kerrigan on Thursday upheld the IRS
decision finding Snipes failed to provide sufficient proof of his assets
and financial condition and the settlement officer didn't abuse her
discretion in rejecting his request.
The lien was placed in August 2013, just a few months after the actor
was released from prison following his conviction on related tax
crimes. At the time, he owed $23.5 million for the years 2001 through
2006. Snipes then requested an installment agreement or OIC and made his
cash payment. A settlement officer looked into his real estate holdings
and assets but was unable to determine that he no longer owned certain
properties that he claimed to have unloaded. Following the
investigation, the officer determined that the reasonable amount that
could be collected was about $17.5 million, but Snipes didn't increase
his OIC offer.
During the proceedings that followed, Snipes claimed his financial
adviser had taken out loans and disposed of assets without his knowledge
and offered up an affidavit from the adviser admitting to misconduct —
but he didn't provide documentation showing the diversion of the
assets.
The settlement officer later reduced Snipes' estimated liability to $9.5 million, but Snipes stayed with his original offer.
"Given the disparity between petitioner’s $842,061 OIC and the
settlement officer’s calculation of $9,581,027 as his RCP, as well as
petitioner’s inability to credibly document his assets, the settlement
officer and her manager had ample justification to reject the offer,"
writes Kerrigan in the opinion, also noting that Snipes failed to show
paying the bill would result in economic hardship. "Accordingly, we
conclude that the settlement officer did not abuse her discretion in
determining that acceptance of petitioner’s OIC was not in the best
interest of the United States."
© 2018 The Hollywood Reporter. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment